Sorry if you needed to resume at 5gb - this will always resume at (*) If partial exists, timestamp matches, send FileSize(handle) in HEX (*) If timestamp has changed, client will always send $00000000 + FileSize (ASCII) + CRC16 + Data_Len_Byte + $80000000 ETX (as weĮxpect no errors on TCP most of the time, Data_Len_Byte and $80000000Ĭ: $00000000 (denotes start sending at 0th byte, could be any value up S: STX + null terminated filename + EPOCH 64bit (ASCII, ZERO PAD LEFT) Like BinkP CRC mode = $80000000 means start at -1 (wait for client toĭata_Len_Byte = Value * 1024 = Block Size, acceptable values 1, 2, 4, 8, 16,Ĭ: Sender Wait for Ctrl-E (Enquiry) up to 30 seconds, timeout=return to BBS The protocol is VERY simple (like Modem7 & YModem - with a few header Was 100% saturation of my outbound at the house (I know SLOW). I did a simple terminal, and pushed 480Kbs up to the server. Like -G or Windowed, so it is push w/o epecting error(s). Does SyncTerm YModem support more than 1K? I am keen on publishing protocols their XModem extensions apply to both X and Y. If you're going to work on extending any legacy protocols, I would start with YMODEM at On 21:40:27 +0000, Digital Man -> Ozz Nixon said:įirstly, XMODEM is a pretty bad protocol (no file name/metadata, up to 127 bytes of garbage tacked on received files, no streaming). then wrap back around and doĪ security level test end to end. Yes, the Alpha test we just did this week was a success, I have would like to make sure all the efforts I am doing full take advantage of SyncTerm - fonts, graphics and sound (if it does it), andīut seeing you're here just a quick Hi from me and hope all the coding and work on your BBS is going well. I'm sure Digital Man will come back to you on this one Ozz :) Reading an XModem Variant specs, does SyncTerm support #2,3, or 4? On at 11:45p, Ozz Nixon pondered and said. Go ahead, twist my arm, okay - that's enough.On 15:24:10 +0000, Avon -> Ozz Nixon said: If I have to upgrade, then gosh darn it, I guess I'll just have to. If not, I may just have to upgrade to something better. I think I need to research my router some more and find out if it does have more than 1 channel. In use (and I know I've had the problem when both were turned off), I feel certain it's not the WiModems. The only other wireless devices are my wife's iPhone and the other 2 WiModem 232's that I have. I'm not sure what in my household would be interfering. If you do have this ability with your router then that should solve the ping issue. This insures that nothing else in my house will interfere with it. I assigned one of the 2.4GHz transceivers strictly for my WiModem. I have a router (TP-Link) that has two 2.4GHz transceivers, and two 5.8GHz transceivers. Your router probably only has a single receiver for the 2.4GHz side. (10-09-2021, 03:37 PM)admin Wrote: It could be that you have some other device on your network that is accessing your router periodically that is interrupting the connection. I feel all of this just means that there is certainly something wrong with my WiFi, but I just don't know what. With the UDS-10 hooked up to the BBS, and set to "raw", I can successfully do downloads and uploads with Zmodem. The second picture is with the Lantronix UDS-10 hooked up to the BBS. I've had several people tell me that's too high. It does settle down after that but still, the average ping time is 18ms. The first picture is the WiModem 232 hooked up to my STacy (settings pretty much the same as for the BBS). So it was late last night and I decided to play around with "ping". Here's what the broken screens/menus look like: With the WiModem 232 we can download Zmodem okay, but the only way to upload is Xmodem (but we talked about Zmodem and it's tight tolerances already). A handful of callers are still getting "broken screens" and I even get them here sometimes, and that's with a Win10 box, SyncTerm, and a hard-wired CAT5 LAN connection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |